We measure before we build, and we hand over what we make
Enterprises is an automation practice, not a software vendor. We started in 2016 rebuilding a single invoice-processing function, and the discipline that came out of that engagement — measure the process, model the return, build only what pays — is still how every project runs.
- Founded
- 2016
- Automation engineers
- 64
- Headquarters
- Boston, MA
- Delivery hubs
- Boston · Lisbon · Singapore
- Largest client
- 42,000 employees
- Engagements delivered
- 210+
How we work
Six principles, and we will not bend them for a deal
We measure before we build
No automation starts without a baseline and a costed business case. If the payback is not there, we say so — that is cheaper for both of us than a project that cannot be defended.
Your systems remain the system of record
We build alongside what you run rather than demanding replacement. Data flows through supported interfaces, access is inherited from your identity provider, and new layers stay replaceable.
Cheapest tool that solves the step
A database constraint beats a business rule, a rule beats a model, and a model beats a person only when the input is genuinely unstructured. We do not sell AI where a join would do.
Handover is a deliverable
Typed code, tests on the critical paths, infrastructure as code and architecture documentation. You should be able to take the system in-house at any point, and several clients have.
The people doing the work design it
Automation built without the operators gets worked around. Frontline staff sit in the design sessions, because they know the exceptions that the process documentation forgot.
Security is an input, not a review
Data classification, residency, least privilege and audit requirements are settled in week one, not discovered in a pre-launch review that pushes the go-live date.
History
Ten years of learning what actually sticks
2016
Founded around a single finance process
Started as three engineers rebuilding an invoice-processing function for a manufacturing group. The measured baseline from that first engagement is still the template for how we assess every process since.
2018
From scripts to systems
Clients kept asking for the tooling around the automation, not just the automation. We formalised the internal software practice and began shipping purpose-built applications alongside the pipelines.
2020
Models earn their place
Document understanding became good enough to trust with confidence thresholds. We adopted it selectively — for genuinely unstructured input only — and built the human review queue that made it acceptable to compliance teams.
2022
Automation becomes a platform problem
Successful pilots were becoming critical infrastructure with no operational owner. We stood up the platform practice to build tenancy, observability and metering into these systems from the start.
2024
Priced against savings
We moved to milestone structures with a portion of fees tied to measured savings. It aligns the engagement with the outcome and forces us to only accept work we believe will clear its own payback.
2026
140 processes in production
Across 19 sectors and 24 countries, with a median measured payback of under seven months and a client relationships measured in years rather than projects.
Who you will work with
The people who will actually be on your engagement
A. Renner
Founder & Principal
Spent eleven years in shared services operations before founding the firm. Leads the assessment practice and signs off every business case we present.
M. Okonjo
Head of Automation Engineering
Builds the pipelines and the extraction models. Previously led document automation for a top-five European insurer.
S. Lindqvist
Head of Platform
Owns multi-tenancy, observability and the operating model. Has run on-call for systems handling several billion transactions a year.
D. Bhatt
Head of Delivery
Keeps engagements on schedule and clients unsurprised. Runs the milestone review process and the performance guarantees.
Compliance and certifications
Certifications listed are placeholders for this build. Replace with current, verifiable attestations before launch — including audit report dates and the entity they apply to.
Bring us the process you already know is costing too much
Thirty minutes with an engineer is usually enough to tell whether it is worth automating, roughly what it would save, and whether the payback is inside a window your finance team will accept. If the answer is no, we will say so on the call.